翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ American Boy Scouts ・ American Boychoir School ・ American Boyfriends ・ American Braille ・ American Brain Tumor Association ・ American Brass Company ・ American Brass Quintet ・ American Brass Superfund site ・ American Breast Cancer Foundation ・ American Brewery (building) ・ American Bridge Association ・ American Bridge Company ・ American British Academy ・ American Broadcasting Companies ・ American Broadcasting Company ・ American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. ・ American Broadcasting Station in Europe ・ American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres ・ American Bronchoesophagological Association ・ American Bryological and Lichenological Society ・ American Buddhist Movement ・ American Buddhist Society and Fellowship, Inc. ・ American Buff goose ・ American Buffalo ・ American buffalo ・ American Buffalo (coin) ・ American Buffalo (film) ・ American Buffalo (play) ・ American Bulldog ・ American Bulldog Association Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. ''American Broadcasting Companies v. Aereo'', , was a United States Supreme Court case. The Court ruled that the service provided by Aereo, allowing subscribers to view live and time-shifted streams of over-the-air television on Internet-connected devices, violated copyright laws. == Background == Cable companies are required by the 1992 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act to negotiate for retransmission consent, usually paying broadcasters for the right to carry their signals. Broadcasters argued that Aereo was a threat both to their business model, by undermining the cable retransmission fees and the size of their audience. Because the fees cable companies pay for broadcast content can comprise up to 10% of a broadcaster's revenue, broadcasters object to Aereo's re-distribution of this content without paying any fees. Broadcasters have also identified Aereo as part of the cord-cutting trend among television audiences that poses a threat to broadcasters' advertising revenue. In somewhat similar cases, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted an injunction against Aereo's rival FilmOn, a similar service. However, the district court's injunction is only legally binding in its jurisdiction (including the West Coast of the continental United States, Alaska and Hawaii) and is currently being appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Other competitors have been blocked from providing service in Los Angeles and Seattle by similar injunctions. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.